> The problem is that definitions of template methods are to be defined inline > (in the header within the class definition or outside the class definition > defining it as 'inline'.
> Anyway, my advice is to keep the overload maybe moving shared code not > involving the type to a helper function. Playing with templates is painfull. Right. Return to overload, which seems necessary now. The svn doesn't allow commiting, so I just send patches to the list: * SchemaBrower.cxx: add hasScope() to make the overloaded addAttribute() suitable for AggregationEditor * AggregationEditor.cxx: remove the attributeList->findItems, because 'source' won't repeat Jun ----- Original Message ----- From: "David García Garzón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jun Jun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 12:04 AM Subject: Re: Problems of function template
OverLoadFunctionIsProper.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Clam-devel mailing list [email protected] https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-devel
