You can call the technique 'selective method instantiation by means of a an static boolean type trait parameter'.
On Thursday 05 February 2009 20:38:17 David García Garzón wrote: > BTW, Nat, I just noticed that the GetLastValueAsString prevented Control > unit tests to compile because they used a control data with no << operator. > So i just fast implemented the technique i mentioned you the other day we > used for serialization. I seems to compile now, and pass the tests but > there is no test for such method so it could have stopped working. So if > you find problems with the control printers, just blame me. > > On Thursday 05 February 2009 20:11:18 David García Garzón wrote: > > I just took the first task on checking that the float dependant interface > > is ok for the next steps: > > > > I found that the following functions are not used at all but in the > > tests: Out::SendControlAsBoolean > > Out::SendControlAsInteger > > In::LastValueAsBoolean > > In::LastValueAsInteger > > (Not including LastValueAsString, still needed for a while) > > So i just removed them and the related tests. Now on we can recommend > > using templated controls for bool and integer instead. > > > > The other check i did was for float default values and bounds. There was > > a dupped implementation on TypedControls that has been removed. Now float > > defaults and bounds related interface is in the base class. Which is not > > consistent yet but anyway is what we have now. > > > > Francisco i think that it is ready to try step 2 and to check whether all > > is still working. Warn us if you try, because i will do ninja attacks to > > the roadmap, from time to time. > > > > David. > > > > On Wednesday 04 February 2009 23:43:12 Natanael Olaiz wrote: > > > Thanks to David for the list, and Francisco for take the task! > > > > > > I'll try to improve the printer and OSC implementation. For now, here > > > is a screenshot (the wiki is down :( ) of the actual state: > > > receiving OSC typed controls > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Natanael > > > > > > El 02/04/2009 09:59 PM, Francisco Tufró escribió: > > > > I can take some time to finish this. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:29 PM, David García Garzón > > > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > Just for the record, and just in case some one wants to take them > > > > before i can > > > > do it: > > > > > > > > Current refactoring status (X=In or Out): > > > > > > > > - BaseXControl: Is the base class for any X controls > > > > - XControl: Is the old control interface for just floats > > > > - TypedXControl<T>: Is the new templated interface > > > > - FloatXControl: Is a typedef to XControl to easy the transition > > > > > > > > To get there: > > > > - Most common behaviour has been moved to BaseXControl. > > > > - All uses of XControl has been renamed to BaseXControl or > > > > FloatXControl > > > > depending on the kind of usage (general or float). > > > > - Some direct control sending has been abstracted into functions > > > > living in > > > > Processing.hxx > > > > > > > > Target status: > > > > > > > > - BaseXControl: Is the base class for any X controls > > > > - XControl<T>: Is the new templated interface (renamed!) > > > > - FloatXControl: Should point to XControl<float> or we could > > > > remove it > > > > > > > > So, pending steps are: > > > > > > > > 1- Converge existing differences in float interface (bounds, > > > > defaults and > > > > bool/int conversion) in BaseXControl/XTypedControl versus > > > > XControl one. > > > > 2- Point FloatXControl typedef to XControl<T> and check that all > > > > is still > > > > working properly ¬¬ > > > > 3- Remove the XControl classes, checking that there still is no > > > > direct dependency on them > > > > 4- Rename TypedXControl<T> to XControl<T> so we have the same > > > > interface than > > > > with ports. > > > > 5- Rename FloatXControl usage to XControl<float> (or keep it as > > > > we have > > > > AudioInPorts as InPort<float> alias) > > > > > > > > Other issues to address eventually: > > > > > > > > 6- Decide what to do with the Bound and Default interface in > > > > BaseXControl > > > > 7- What to do with the free functions in Processing.hxx that > > > > handle float > > > > control sending. > > > > 8- Make XControlPublishers not just float > > > > > > > > > > > > David. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Clam-devel mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > > > > https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-d > > > >ev el > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >-- - > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Clam-devel mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-d > > > >ev el _______________________________________________ Clam-devel mailing list [email protected] https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-devel
