> Cool. But could you be more specific on what is missing from the SemWeb
> extractor? I understood from Jun this was already working and this is
> really important for the WWW demo: actually, this is the point of our
> article (I think one of the W in WWW stands for web :-)
>
David realized that I extracted webpage information via pattern matching, which
is much clumsier than the solution with xml.
But David, in case you're too busy and runing out of time, for the moment,
bearing with the crappy one would be just fine.
>
> David García Garzón wrote:
>> - Add a second segment views so that you can see the onsets and the chords
>> side by side
>> - Side note: you can now compare results from different extractors or an
>> extractor with a ground truth.
It rocks.
Cheers,
Jun
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clam-devel mailing list
> Clam-devel@llistes.projectes.lafarga.org
> https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Clam-devel mailing list
Clam-devel@llistes.projectes.lafarga.org
https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-devel
