On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:06:28PM +0200, Thomas Lamy wrote:
> Joe Talbott wrote:
> >What are your ideas on having the mbox scanning code handle
> >attachments in-line rather than writing to/reading from the
> >filesystem? Due to the size of our mail system (~ 1 million messages
> >per day) it seems disk access will be a bottleneck.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Joe
> >
> Why scan mail when it's already delivered? We handle ~750k mails/day,
> using amavisd-new and clamd, coming in through load-balanced mail
> exchangers, which deliver mail to the mbox servers after content
> scanning. Runs like a charm, and, because of load balancing, it's easily
> extendible. Plus amavisd-new enables us to run spamassassin on mail for
> selected domains...
>
> Thomas
>
We want to reject viruses before they're delivered. We are looking
for a milter based solution to virus scanning. We would prefer to
avoid using Perl and temporary files.
Joe
--
Sometimes the only way you can feel good about yourself is by
making someone else look bad. And I'm tired of making other
people feel good about themselves!
- Homer Simpson
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
