On [08/24/03 15:40], Tomasz Kojm wrote: > On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 09:08:45 -0400 > > YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM, COMPLETELY. I want you to answer > on the question above. I want the exact number of bytes it will use > afer that "virtual update".
This is getting pointless. Give me the databsae, and I'll tell you memory usage. > > ???!!!!! Do you really use clamav from clamav.elektrapro.com ??? > Yes, I'm using clamav-0.60 from clamav.elektrapro.com with the patch from my previous email applied. Did you apply the patch before reporting the error? I think you just changed CL_MIN_LENGHT and expect things to work. > > No THIS IS BULLSHIT. See attached script file which CLEARLY > > shows that magistr was deteccted FINE with 3 levels. > > I'm not going to check that script. Please read the libclamav/matcher.c > file very carefully and maybe you will understand why it _must_ fail. > In our implementation the regular expressions in the trie CAN'T WORK. > Just like I though: in essense, you're saying: I know it CAN'T WORK, so I'm not going to bother applying the patch, and I'm simply going to make baseless, unverified, and untrue statements, and pretend they are true. Great logic -- Way to go. It's always nice to talk to somebody who is open to ideas and suggestions. BTW, I did read matcher.c very carefully, unlike you, who did not even bother to look at the patch (this is pretty obvious to me at point). You ask not make make a fool of you. I'd appreciate if you did not take me for an idiot who did not do his research before posting it. Pointing out my mistakes is fine, making baseless statements is not. -- Eugene Miretskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> INVISION.COM, INC. (631) 543-1000 www.invision.net / www.longisland.com
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
