On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Nigel Horne wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Monday 22 Sep 2003 5:49 am, Tom Brown wrote: > > > hhmm, the ability to hang clamd could be considered a security bug... sure > > wreaks havoc with our systems... :-( > > > /:home:~> clamscan --mbox bad.mbox > > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > > > /:home:~> clamscan --version > > clamscan / ClamAV version 0.60 > > I just tried it and got this:
yes, I know better now... > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ clamscan --mbox bad.mbox > LibClamAV Warning: Empty attachment not saved > bad.mbox: OK > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ clamscan --version > clamscan / ClamAV version 20030829 yes, this was yet another 'bogus' bug report that could be fixed by having a more current "release" than 0.60 ... what are the plans for "blessing" another tarball with the title "stable versin" and putting it up on the http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/clamav/ page? Given that all the suggestions on this list to pretty much every bug report is "upgrade" it doesn't seem to make a lot of sense to even have 0.60 up there. strange that clamscan calls aprox 100 lines of base64 an "empty attachment", but I know next to nothing about mime. I see other antivirus scanners producing messages like that... the email is 110k but the contents are about 4k ... note also that the version numbers from 20030829 are pretty bogus... [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# clamscan --version clamscan / ClamAV version 20030829 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qi clamav Name : clamav Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : devel_20030922 Vendor: (none) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Clamav-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-devel
