On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:33:00 -0800 Ozgun Erdogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a paper draft that discusses our approach with tons of > performance data (and it's an easy read): > > http://raconsoft.com/products/opensource/hash-av.pdf This paper compares HashAV to some outdated version of ClamAV. Scalability and efficiency of the ClamAV engine was significantly improved in August, 2004. Serious publications _must_ include details on tested software versions. > What do ClamAV developers think? What would be the pros and cons of > running HashAV? Please include a comparison/description of the 0.80 release of ClamAV. More detailed test on other architectures would also be appreciated. Best regards, -- oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Thu Dec 9 18:52:48 CET 2004
pgp4KZD1A5jJ6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-devel
