> > given the flurry of discussion re: clamav on OSX, i though i'd just > > offer as an fyi, 0.65 builds/runs flawlessly for me > > on OSX 10.2.x & 10.3.x on a variety of stock & upgraded boxes. > > I can confirm that it builds fine on 10.3.
As I understand it, Apple fully supported pthreads as of 10.2. > > i can't say i agree with the suggestion that the developers spend > > their time supporting OSX 10.1.x -- which is no > > longer supported by Apple > > > > i'm sure its tough enough worrying about current OSes ... It's more than that. It's a case of cash. I don't have the money to shell out £100 on what is effectively just a set of bug fixes. Hey I don't have £100 to shell out anyway! > I'm not asking for someone to put hours of work in, just to add the > lines to make it build properly. Now, if someone has a reason why it > is potentially disasterous to run clamav on 10.1.x, that would > obviously change my opinion. I second that. -Nigel -- Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter. NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.uk ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
