On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > Jesper Juhl wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Antony Stone wrote: > >>What has sendmail's *recent* history of security problems been like? Where > >>can I see some tests showing postfix or qmail are better? > >> > > > > Security issues aside, postfix is significantly simpler to setup and > > maintain than sendmail and deals just fine with heavy loads. It might be > > slightly less flexible, but for 99% of all users I'd say it's more than > > flexible enough. > > If you know what you're doing with mail, sendmail isn't hard to setup. > My sendmail.mc has only 58 non-comment lines, which isn't exactly > terrifying. > I agree, but for the inexperienced admin Postfix is usually simpler. Both are nice MTAs.
-- Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sysadmin, Danmarks Idręts-Forbund / Sports Confederation of Denmark Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
