> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Trog
> Enviado el: Martes, 25 de Mayo de 2004 09:28 a.m.
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam: NotifyClamd or not NotifyClamd
>
>
> On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 13:59, Samuel Benzaquen wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We've been running clamd / clamav-milter for some weeks without
> problems,
> > but this morning one of the clamd processes hanged up on freshclam's
> > notification.
> >
> > We have 8 RH7.3 Linux servers, running sendmail 8.12.11 + clamd / ClamAV
> > version 0.70, clamav-milter version 0.70j.
> >
> > 7 out of 8 servers continued working after notification, but
> one hanged up
> > and queued the clamav-milter processes.
> >
> > It this a NotifyClamd problem?
> > Should I disable it and wait for clamd's auto check?
>
> Upgrade to 0.71.
>
> It was most likely waiting for a scanning thread to finish, which it has
> to do before it can reload the sig DB. If a scanning thread fails to
> finish, that indicates a bug in the scanner somewhere (which may have
> been fixed already).

Is there any way I can reproduce this problem?
Just to see if the upgrade fixes it.

>
> You should try and recover the file that is has a problem scanning.

How can I do that?
We have no quarantine directory configured.

- samuel



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users

Reply via email to