Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 14:47 schrieb Robert Blayzor: Hi,
> > No, multicast is not the most efficient solution and does no caching. > > Honestly imho the DNS approach is the most feasable and the most > > efficient solution as it provides incoherent caching uses udp and reuses > > a widly available infrastructure. > > Why would you need caching? PIM sparse helps in some situations but it put extra load on the routers. I like the fact the PIM sparse is a "request-only service but still imho a pull is better than a push approach. For enterprise use and its security policies using http for the download is most appropriate especially when using caching upstream http proxies. > Especially when using PIM sparse. Regards, -- martin Dipl.-Phys. Martin Konold e r f r a k o n Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker Nobelstrasse 15, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany fon: 0711 67400963, fax: 0711 67400959 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
