Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Tomasz, can you please make future changes to clamav
backward-compatible? In this case, renaming my clamav.conf to
Almost all changes are backward compatible but the point of the renaming was to force users to review/edit their config files. Most of you are simply too lazy to add, activate, or tune new options without such dramatic changes.
Yes, I was pretty lazy when it comes to that :) /me hides
Is there a particular reason to FORCE people to take-a-look at their clamd options?
Is it not enough to leave it as-is if they're happy with it?
Most of the stable option (such as ScanMail) are enabled by default anyway.
Especially since make install does not even put clamd.conf it the default etc dir
(I'm using latest CVS snapshot, which is newer that the 0.80rc, on
Solaris).
In this special case 0.80rc is newer than CVS ;-)
Really? Then would you say my ChangeLog is wrong?
Mon Sep 20 18:08:53 BST 2004 (njh) ---------------------------------- * libclamav/mbox.c: Some performance enhancements
Mon Sep 20 15:31:21 CEST 2004 (tk) ---------------------------------- V 0.80rc
Regards,
Fajar
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
