On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Rob MacGregor wrote: > On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:26:18 +0000, Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Announcement at > http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/392097/2005-02-28/2005-03-06/0. > > The CVE referenced in it > (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-0133), clearly > states 0.80 and earlier as being the problem.
That's odd. I've subscribed to Bugtraq for years, and they are usually right on the spot with announcements liek this. .80 hasn't been current for what, two months? -- Sam Morris, Owner Loganet Internet Service Logan IA, United States of America 712-644-3578 _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html