> Julian Mehnle wrote: > >> I can't believe you still didn't get the point. >> >>This is NOT about removing ClamAV's capacity for detecting phishing >>attacks, little yellow rubber ducks in PNG images, or whatever else. >> This >>is about making it _optional_, for those people who don't want certain >>types of malware to be scanned for. >> >>_______________________________________________ >>http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html >> >> >> > And they're adding it. So why is the issue festering? > > I understand people want to post their views (as they should). But this > topic in particular has and will end up in a never ending loop, that > tends to be worse than Linux vs Windows debates. > > It died out once, and I hope it does so again, quickly > > > > _______________________________________________ > http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html >
I too have strong feelings on this subject, but it was hashed out a while back, and should be let to die here. AMEN ps: I still think that clamav is one of the finest open source projects going and this list is the most level headed ... subject above excepted :) -- Ken Jones _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
