On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:09:37 -0700, Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Chris de Vidal wanted us to know: > >>Is our situation that foreign? I was half expecting someone to tell me >>"We have a 5TB FTP server and can scan it all under 40 minutes with .25 >>extra load average! You just have to do this..." > >Most people with stuff that large have a three teir system: >1) AV installed on the desktop, auto-updating virus definitions. This >usually implies a commercial AV solution. >2) AV installed on the server, auto-updating virus definitioons, doing >on-access scanning only. This usually implies a commercial AV solution. >3) Secondary AV installed on the server, auto-updating virus >definitions, doing full system scans on set intervals. This can be a >commercial solution but ClamAV fits VERY well into this slot. > >If the scan is occurring during normal business hours, then yeah, you >need to nice the heck out of it to keep it from sucking away >performance. If you know a bit about c, you could add a commandline >option --delay=x where x is the number of milliseconds to pause between >files. > >Good luck! > ><12 line signature snipped> OK, good time to ask my question. Is there any centralized spam scanner available for Linux, a la Symantec Corporate? I'm using clam on my incoming mail servers, and the Symantec product protecting the desktops. But it's the only Windows server app I still have - if I could find a centralized system that could run on Linux, I could dump Windows completely. -- Tim Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
