On Tuesday 03 May 2005 08:23 am, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Mike Lambert wrote:
> > I meant the most stable before 0.84. Sorry for the confusion.
>
> If you had stability problem on 0.81, 0.82, and 0.83 -- did you post them ?
> Sorry if I missed it, but I don't recall seeing anything posted about
> stability problems on those version.

I saw a couple of threads about MIME parsing time jumping exponentially and a 
lot of our customers have pretty high volume systems and this would have 
caused some serious problems.  0.84 was a very welcome sight, I can assure 
you :)

http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20050216.123538.5a838448.en.html

-Jeremy

-- 
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
    [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 815.776.9465 int'l
      kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet IRC ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail
         GnuPG Key ID: 481BF7E2 ++ jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: pgpdu7yzhIj64.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Reply via email to