Dennis Peterson wrote: > There is no need to block outright from the outset.
> As I mentioned earlier, I'm getting slammed from comcast.net from relays > all over the US. It is far easier to block by obvious dsl/cable host > identifiers than to spend hours trying to figure out what /24 IP ranges > to tweek. I see the problem as comcasts, not mine. Your milage may vary > - I know mine did. The point with the above is different. Comcast had the initial, with you, opportunity and made a mess of it. With that level of abuse, if its related to their network in any way or form, it would be blocked. Even I wouldn't bother with a /24 block for that level of abuse. By that point, I would merrily block their entire network, rhsbl and rbl, without giving it a second thought. There is no need to blanket ban every other providers dsl yet, though :) All the best, Matt _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
