On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 20:27 +0100, Per Jessen wrote: > Dennis Peterson wrote: > > > And the point is you don't have to come to harm if a > > phishing pattern is not available. > > That depends on your expectations. If you're purely using it for your > own personal protection, you're absolutely right. If you're using it > as a service to others, whether employees or clients, it's a different > story. > My point is - when I've told someone I can protect them from phishing to > some degree, ClamAV is letting me down by not delivering in time. > > I'd really like to repeat - I am most definitely NOT complaining. I > just think the phishing detection of ClamAV is pointless when it's one > to two days late.
Use the "experimental code", then. It does a good job at catching phishes that aren't even in the database. > /Per Jessen, Zürich -Nigel _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
