Tomasz Kojm wrote: > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:13:38 -0800 > Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Tomasz Kojm wrote the following on 2/15/2007 3:00 PM -0800: >> >>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:51:54 -0800 >>> Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>> I just had to back it out of production. It would not run more than a >>>>> couple minutes under a normal load that 88.7 shrugs off. It dies without >>>>> any error messages. >>>>> >>>>> dp >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Yep, I observed the same behavior on Fedora Core 3, where clamd 0.90 >>>> dies without any indication as to why in any log files. Not good... >>>> >>>> >>> You didn't provide _any_ information that could be useful to us for >>> debugging those issues. >>> >>> >> What kind of info would you want me to provide when there were no >> indications anywhere as to why clamd dies? I have not reverted back >> > > At least some basic information, eg. how you compiled ClamAV, did you use > --enable-experimental, platform details, etc. > >
I had the same problems. FreeBSD/i386 6.2p1 and 6.2p0. Compiled directly from the ports collection, without --experimental. As far as we could tell, it just scanned slower and slower and then stopped scanning. If there's anything I can do to help get the info required to fix this, let me know. Kevin Way InsideSystems, Inc. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html