-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 John Rudd wrote:
> > Seems like, from reading this list, so far ClamAV 0.90.* is pretty > much a disaster. I don't think I'm aware of anyone having a smooth > experience with it. > > Can anyone out there contradict that? Especially on Mac OS X 10.3.9 > and/or Solaris 8? > > _______________________________________________ > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit > http://wiki.clamav.net > http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html No problems with any of the 0.90.* installs. I install from source, running Ubuntu on x86 systems with Postfix and Amavis-new. Forgot to mention, I have not enabled experimental so far based on what I have been reading in this mail list. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF+dtrJ7UPaqqLNe8RAs4xAJ4mTVpXamBjVkFnZT1UIwertwzX4gCdH+qV IAVxnSxe7XSaCTU8i2zk6SI= =8sWE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
