On 4/11/07, John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Depends on what your goals are. > > For me, a reliable email system does not just mean "mail gets > delivered". It also means that "we reliably reject detectable viruses". > If we're letting viruses through because our pants are down (because > our AV tool has failed), then that's not a reliable email system. > That's a dysfunctional email system.
Agreed... > better monitoring and notification: yes, good. Check out argus (http://argus.tcp4me.com) .. Works wonderfully for me. > It's like using condoms. Just because you run out of condoms doesn't > make unprotected sex suddenly "safe". Accepting email from the world > without your AV tool processing it is as irresponsible as having > unprotected sex with the entire world. Ugh.. Thanks.. I'm gonna have nightmares for weeks now.. -- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog.godshell.com _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
