> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:56:22 +0000 > Ian Eiloart <i...@sussex.ac.uk> wrote: > > That sounds good. What does it do, though? > > My guess is that it enables freshclam to download copies of files > > containing URLs that Google considers "unsafe", and then clamd will > > block emails that contain those URLs. Is that right?
On 12.03.09 09:11, Spiro Harvey wrote: > http://code.google.com/apis/safebrowsing/ > > Sounds like it.. might be possible to check realtime too.. but the > quick blurb on the site just mentions downloading a lookup table to the > local machine. > > Looks good to me tho. Yes, but I found this question quite important and "Seems like it" is not satisfactory answer. Customers may (and already did) send us notices about unsafe pages in our hosting (shit happens, while clamav works good for rejecting infected files, it doesnt for .htaccess containing Rewrite*), and I'd like such mail _not_ to be blocked by clamav... I'm also surprised that safebrowsing is an option only for freshclam. Some people reported running two instances of clamav, one with "PhishingSignatures off" for SMTP-level filtering, one with "on" for spam filter. Seems this won't be possible with safebrowsing database... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Spam = (S)tupid (P)eople's (A)dvertising (M)ethod _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
