> Jari Fredriksson wrote: > >> >> Then I decided SaneSecurity is not worth it, as >> SpamAssassin catches those too, and has less false >> positives. >> >> SaneSecurity triggers way too often when some dumb user >> pastes a spam into his mail, or some robot sends a >> bounce with an attachment. I do not want to report those >> cases to SpamCop, Razor, DCC.. Making me writing tons of >> tests in my scripts. Too risky. > > > If someone pasts a spam into their mail it is not a false > positive. It is a post that is indistinguishable from > spam. There are consequences for that. >
Debatable. Anyway, I do not want to punish from that kind of a mistake. I'm not an email nazi, while I indeed am a spam fighter. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
