Test Andrea wrote:
Dear List,

This is my configuration:

CentOS 4.8

# clamdscan -V
ClamAV 0.95.3/10861/Thu Apr 29 04:16:19 2010

# sigtool --info=/home/amavisd/clamav/main.cld
File: /home/amavisd/clamav/main.cld
Build time: 15 Feb 2010 09:54 -0500
Version: 52
Signatures: 704727
Functionality level: 44
Builder: sven

# sigtool --info=/home/amavisd/clamav/daily.cld
File: /home/amavisd/clamav/daily.cld
Build time: 28 Apr 2010 22:16 -0400
Version: 10861
Signatures: 54573
Functionality level: 51
Builder: guitar

From few days ago i had these errors into the freshclam.log:

http://nopaste.info/6ce68caae7.html

Freshclamd running with the -d (Daemon) option at the boot of the Server.

I have this problem only for the incremental update of daily.cld. Yesterday i tried to stop freshclam, remove daily.cld and after the restart the 1st update of the daily.cld worked without errors.

I have the same problem on another server with Clamav 0.95.2 on Centos 5.4.

I'm seeing a similar problem, and I believe it's another issue caused by ClamAV's aggressive policy of disabling older software versions. If I run freshclam with debug options I see errors like this:

Ignoring mirror 217.135.32.99 (has connected too many times with an outdated version) Ignoring mirror 81.91.100.173 (has connected too many times with an outdated version) Ignoring mirror 163.1.3.8 (has connected too many times with an outdated version)

...and so on for the other mirrors I'm using.

I have two scanning boxes running ClamAV built from source, which I've updated to 0.96, and two boxes running Debian Lenny, with ClamAV installed from the packages in the volatile repository. The Debian boxes are running Debian's most recent package, 0.95.3; I only see this problem on those boxes.

The 'outdated version' error appears to be the handling they added to stop older versions (which couldn't do incremental updates) from hammering the mirrors. I guess they're now applying it to all versions except for the most recent, even if they do incremental updates.

If you're running an OS that hasn't packaged 0.96 yet, I think you now need to build ClamAV from source if you want timely signature updates. The odd thing is the ClamAV website still recommends using the Debian Volatile packages.

regards,
Adam

--
--------------------------------
Adam Stephens
Network Specialist - Email & DNS
adam.steph...@bristol.ac.uk

_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Reply via email to