On 9/28/10 9:14 AM, "Dennis Peterson" <denni...@inetnw.com> wrote:

> On 9/28/10 5:40 AM, Daniel McDonald wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 9/28/10 2:05 AM, "Dennis Peterson"<denni...@inetnw.com>  wrote:
>> 
>>> On 9/27/10 11:55 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 04:36:15 +0200
>>> 
>>>> If you want to reject by content, you can do that as well (only for
>>>> nonencrypted archives of course) by writing a signature for your
>>>> filetype, and treating it as if it was a virus.
>>> 
>>> Rather than depend on file extensions that are rather meaningless, it seems
>>> a
>>> better idea to build a Kessler signature file using file signatures from
>>> this
>>> list:
>>> 
>>> http://www.garykessler.net/library/file_sigs.html
>>> 
>> 
>> Amavisd-new gets around that by calling file and adding the type returned as
>> meta-data that can be matched. So, embed an .emf with no extension in an
>> .xlsx?  Amavis will recognize it as an .emf in a zip archive.
>> 
> 
> Gary's list is one of the resources used in the file utility. But some file
> programs have not been updated in a long time. Solaris 10's /etc/magic file is
> dated 2006, for example, and Solaris 9 is from Y2K. My OS X Snow Leopard magic
> files are dated May 18, 2009, and RHEL5 are April, 2009. It would be a good
> idea 

Good call.  I checked Mandriva Enterprise Server and the distro provided
version 4.23, from late 2008.  I've upgraded to file 5.0.4, the most recent
released by the file project, with a release date in 2010.


> to take some ownership of that by way of checking file types that may interest
> you and your mail users.

-- 
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281

_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Reply via email to