-- Joel Esler Manager, Talos Group
On Feb 28, 2016, at 8:26 AM, Theodore Alcapotaxis <summercas...@dcemail.com<mailto:summercas...@dcemail.com>> wrote: --- alvarn...@mac.com<mailto:alvarn...@mac.com> wrote: From: Al Varnell <alvarn...@mac.com<mailto:alvarn...@mac.com>> To: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net<mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Add virus databases and signatures from third-party vendors Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 23:58:15 -0800 I can’t imagine why the competition would ever be willing to share their signature databases with >anybody. It's industry practice that a third-party vendor, e.g. Symantec, discovers a new virus, it has to share it with other vendors such as Eset, Kapersky, McAfee… We share with others, and lots of people share with us. But we do not exchange Definitions. Why would a user invest in a commercial A-V software package if they could get the same scanning >protection for free? I disagree. Scan engines differ by vendor. Annually at ZDnet there's a rundown of which antivirus and malware software offers the best protection such as the ability to detect and clean the most number of viruses, trojans and malware, the fastest scan, etc. _____________________________________________________________ Washington DC's Largest FREE Email service. ---> http://www.DCemail.com<http://www.dcemail.com> ---> A Washington Online Community Member ---> http://www.DCpages.com<http://www.dcpages.com> _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
