I'm not asking to update previously collected signatures. At-least from now on while adding new ones lets have it as sha256sum.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Al Varnell <alvarn...@mac.com> wrote: > I'm struggling to understand how that would improve the DB? It's not a > security issue and it would seemingly involve a ton of work to run all > those samples again just to get a larger number which would require > additional time to download and space to store the DB as well as in RAM. > > -Al- > > On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 04:12 AM, Vijayakumar U wrote: > > Dear Team, > > > > Do we have any plans to maintain/update the signature DB with sha256sum? > > > > Is there any specific reason to maintain the signatures in md5sum format? > > > > Please clarify. > > _______________________________________________ > clamav-users mailing list > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users > > > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml > -- Cheers, Vijay. _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
