PUA's tend to have a lot of false positives due to them being Potential.
I wouldn't recommend using them unless you really need a strict scan with
the ability to whitelist when needed.

Sincerely,

Eric Tykwinski
TrueNet, Inc.
P: 610-429-8300

> -----Original Message-----
> From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On
> Behalf Of Alex
> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 12:44 PM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: [clamav-users] PUA.Win.Trojan.EmbeddedPDF-1 false-positives
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We're seeing a large number of false-positives with the above rule. Is
> it particularly prone to false-positives? Would someone explain how it
> works?
> 
> What's perhaps even more strange is that scanning the email again (or
> the files within the email) don't produce the same false-positives.
> 
> Was there a period where this pattern had a problem and has now been
> corrected?
> _______________________________________________
> clamav-users mailing list
> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
> 
> 
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
> 
> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml


_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Reply via email to