I'm told that the current implementation for VirusEvent in clamd doesn't play well with OnAccess scanning due to the way clamd and OnAccess use threads and the way the current VirusEvent feature relies on forking. VirusEvent was disabled when used with OnAccess until a better implementation can be implemented.
We have a bugzilla ticket here to track the issue: https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12152. Regards, Micah Micah Snyder ClamAV Development Talos Cisco Systems, Inc. On Aug 3, 2018, at 10:38 PM, greengrasseyes <greengrasse...@protonmail.com<mailto:greengrasse...@protonmail.com>> wrote: I am having a similar issue can anyone confirm or deny this is the reason for issue: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=237489 _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
_______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
