I cannot argue that malware does not show up in Google Docs which is wide open to anybody that wants to post there, as I know it has occurred. Not sure how big a problem it has become for Google to police. I think it would be better if malwarepatrol were to list the specific site where the malware was reportedly found, rather than condemning the entire sub-domain.
-Al- On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 01:00 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Alex <mysqlstud...@gmail.com <mailto:mysqlstud...@gmail.com>>: >> Another malwarepatrol fp for docs.google.com <http://docs.google.com/> >> >> # sigtool --find-sigs MBL_17713260 |sigtool --decode-sigs >> VIRUS NAME: MBL_17713260 >> TARGET TYPE: ANY FILE >> OFFSET: * >> DECODED SIGNATURE: >> https://docs.google.com <https://docs.google.com/> >> >> I don't even know what to do anymore. Is it worth it to keep malwarepatrol? > > I'm wondering this as well. That stuff pops up every other day.
_______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
