Thanks Alain.

> On Dec 12, 2018, at 10:17 AM, Alain Zidouemba <azidoue...@sourcefire.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> The Phistank URLs being dropped from daily.cvd have nothing to do with false 
> positives. We are just rotating in and out the top phishing URLs based on 
> number DNS lookups per hour.
> 
> - Alain
> 
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 6:23 AM Joel Esler (jesler) <jes...@cisco.com 
> <mailto:jes...@cisco.com>> wrote:
> Not sure.  Perhaps Alain can chime in.  My team also runs the Phishtank 
> project, so this is about making our different properties work together 
> through the official signature set in a supported way.  If false positives 
> are reported on the phishtank sigs through ClamAV.net <http://clamav.net/>, 
> they are automatically routed to my team for resolution in the phishtank feed 
> and in ClamAV.  
> 
> Sent from my  iPhone
> 
> On Dec 12, 2018, at 03:59, Al Varnell <alvarn...@mac.com 
> <mailto:alvarn...@mac.com>> wrote:
> 
>> You mentioned earlier that ClamAV has recently added signatures from 
>> PhishTank, but I've noticed over the last few days that most, if not all of 
>> them have been removed. Should I conclude that the PhishTank organization 
>> signatures are resulting in a high False Positive count? Are they simply 
>> accepting all the submissions they get as valid fishing attempts and not 
>> QAing them before release?
>> 
>> Part of my interest is that I've been providing input to them for years 
>> after first establishing that the spam e-mail I received is from an address 
>> that doesn't match the purported notice of impeding doom and offer to fix by 
>> clicking a link which does not match the announced domain? I'm not sure all 
>> users would go to such lengths and might be forwarding all their spam to 
>> these folks. Or perhaps some are flooding the site with valid url's in an 
>> attempt defeat their purpose.
>> 
>> -Al-
>> 
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 08:01 PM, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote:
>>> Hi Sunny,
>>> 
>>> I meant to say that if I scanned a saved email file containing the 
>>> malicious URL in an HTML link (i.e.   a href=link  ), then it will detect 
>>> the link with the safebrowsing signature.  However, if the malicious URL is 
>>> not an HTML link, for example if the email content is plain text, then the 
>>> safebrowsing signature does not appear to alert. 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Micah
>>>  
>>> Micah Snyder
>>> ClamAV Development
>>> Talos
>>> Cisco Systems, Inc.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Dec 11, 2018, at 8:58 AM, Sunny Marwah <sunnymar...@trepup.com 
>>>> <mailto:sunnymar...@trepup.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Al,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for sharing that reply.
>>>> 
>>>> Do you mean ClamAV did not detect that file (containing deceptive link) as 
>>>> 'Infected" in your scanning ?
>>>> 
>>>> FYI, i have also tried Google's Safebrowsing API to check such deceptive 
>>>> links.
>>>> 
>>>> It was really strange to know that even Google's Safebrowsing lookup API 
>>>> did not detect that file as 'Unsafe'. The reason behind is the deceptive 
>>>> link is phishing link but not malware.
>>>> 
>>>> So Google's Safebrowsing lookup API will identify only Malware links as 
>>>> 'Unsafe' but not all deceptive links. However, when i check the same URL 
>>>> on "https://transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/search 
>>>> <https://transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/search>", then it 
>>>> shows 'site is unsafe' what i am actually looking for.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards
>>>> Sunny
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 5:28 PM Al Varnell <alvarn...@mac.com 
>>>> <mailto:alvarn...@mac.com>> wrote:
>>>> Here was the earlier reply to your question
>>>> <http://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/2018-December/007245.html 
>>>> <http://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/2018-December/007245.html>>.
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>> 
>>>> -Al-
>>>> 
>>>> On Dec 10, 2018, at 21:46, Sunny Marwah <sunnymar...@trepup.com 
>>>> <mailto:sunnymar...@trepup.com>> wrote:
>>>>> Same question again : Chrome don't open malicious links due to labeling 
>>>>> them dangerous as per "Safebrowsing". Then why ClamAV is not able to 
>>>>> identify such malicious links when "Safebrowsing" option is already 
>>>>> enabled ??  
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 9:00 PM Micah Snyder (micasnyd) 
>>>>>> <micas...@cisco.com <mailto:micas...@cisco.com>> wrote:
>>>>> Our replies may be getting filtered by your email provider because you 
>>>>> included a malicious link in the email chain. :D  I removed the link from 
>>>>> this reply. 
>>>>> 
>>>>>  
>>>>> Micah Snyder
>>>>> ClamAV Development
>>>>> Talos
>>>>> Cisco Systems, Inc.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Dec 8, 2018, at 9:17 AM, Sunny Marwah <sunnymar...@trepup.com 
>>>>>> <mailto:sunnymar...@trepup.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Still no reply on this matter. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Regards
>>>> Sunny
>>>> System Engineer
>>>> Mob : +91 9711155549 <tel:+91%209711155549>
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> clamav-users mailing list
>>>> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net <mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
>>>> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users 
>>>> <http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
>>>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq 
>>>> <https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq>
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml 
>>>> <http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml>
>>> 
>> 
>> -Al-
>> -- 
>> Al Varnell
>> Mountain View, CA
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> clamav-users mailing list
>> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net <mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
>> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users 
>> <http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users>
>> 
>> 
>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq 
>> <https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq>
>> 
>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml <http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml>
> _______________________________________________
> clamav-users mailing list
> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net <mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users 
> <http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users>
> 
> 
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq 
> <https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq>
> 
> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml <http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml>
> _______________________________________________
> clamav-users mailing list
> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
> 
> 
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
> 
> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Reply via email to