On 1/17/2020 1:39 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>> On 17.01.20 12:25, Bowie Bailey wrote: >>>> I just upgraded from ClamAV 101.4 to 102.1 on CentOS 7.4. Clam runs fine >>>> (through >>>> avfilter for Courier), but when I run freshclam, I get an error: >>>> >>>> # freshclam >>>> freshclam: error while loading shared libraries: libfreshclam.so.2: cannot >>>> open >>>> shared object file: No such file or directory >>>> >>>> # ll /usr/local/lib64/libfreshclam.* >>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1134 Jan 17 12:01 >>>> /usr/local/lib64/libfreshclam.la >>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 21 Jan 17 12:01 >>>> /usr/local/lib64/libfreshclam.so -> >>>> libfreshclam.so.2.0.0 >>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 21 Jan 17 12:01 >>>> /usr/local/lib64/libfreshclam.so.2 -> >>>> libfreshclam.so.2.0.0 >>>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 481680 Jan 17 12:01 >>>> /usr/local/lib64/libfreshclam.so.2.0.0 > >> On 1/17/2020 1:03 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>> uninstall system version of clamav. >>> >>> or, better, uninstall your version of clamav and get one from repository >>> that provides current clamav for centos7 > > On 17.01.20 13:11, Bowie Bailey wrote: >> I don't have a system version of clamav. >> >> I had 101.4 installed and working (compiled from source). I downloaded >> 102.1 from >> clamav.net and built it using the standard build procedure. I have >> installed clam >> this way for years without any problems. > > was the 0.101.4 installed the same way as 0.102.1 ? Did you uninstall it > before > installing 0.102.1?
It was installed exactly the same way except for an extra --disable-clamonacc flag on ./configure. > there may be problem in the sandard build process of 0.102.1 for centos > try running ldd `which freshclam` and it should show where it searches for > libfreshclam Here are the first several lines: # ldd `which freshclam` linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffed21c6000) libssl.so.10 => /lib64/libssl.so.10 (0x00007f9a54ec6000) libcrypto.so.10 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.10 (0x00007f9a54a65000) libclamav.so.9 => /usr/local/lib64/libclamav.so.9 (0x00007f9a54689000) libfreshclam.so.2 => not found libresolv.so.2 => /lib64/libresolv.so.2 (0x00007f9a54470000) libcurl.so.4 => /lib64/libcurl.so.4 (0x00007f9a54206000) libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007f9a53ff0000) It says 'not found', but libfreshclam.so.2 lives in the same directory as the libclamav.so.9 that it did find. The dates indicate that the file is part of the build that was installed today (same with the freshclam binary). Is there something I can change on the build to specify the file location? > however, I prefer using installing from sane package maintainers. > I don't know how does the redhat (and thus centos) clamav support work, but > Debians's usually works perfectly I have always preferred to build ClamAV and SpamAssassin from source so I don't have to wait on the packages. I just got a bit behind on ClamAV this time because I had to wait for avfilter to be updated to work with ClamAV 102. -- Bowie _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
