> I keep running into reservations about clamAV. It is often claimed that > clamAV has a poor detection rate compared to other solutions. I then often > lack an answer based on hard facts. Do you also have this problem? If so, > is there good data somewhere to compare clamAV with other solutions?
I was recently thinking exactly the same. I even tried searching for some test results, but found nothing significant. > Or do > you have good arguments with which you have convinced? > Having something is always better than nothing, as long as you keep in mind that virus scanning processes is always a few steps behind. Thus if someone targets you specifically, they are useless. I see them more like to prevent accidental spreading, which is probably the most common scenario. _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
