Hi Team,

This is regarding the issue discussed here:
https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/issues/1424.

I have observed similar behavior with the *INSTREAM* command — the data is
not scanned incrementally as it is streamed to the socket. Instead, the
scan only begins after all bytes have been written to the socket. This
makes it functionally similar to a normal *SCAN* operation, and therefore,
it doesn’t provide the expected advantage of parallel or progressive
scanning.

I’d like to use this platform to better understand the *intended behavior
and limitations*:
*a.* Why doesn’t ClamAV support incremental scanning during streaming? Are
there architectural or technical constraints that prevent implementing this
functionality?
*b.* Could we also consider updating the official documentation to
explicitly clarify the behavior of *INSTREAM*? Many users assume that it
performs scanning while data is being streamed, which seems to be a common
misunderstanding.

For example, the documentation could include a note such as:

*“The INSTREAM command does not perform incremental scanning. File data is
fully buffered before scanning begins. INSTREAM is intended for
transferring files to ClamD for scanning, not for real-time or progressive
scanning of streamed data.”*

This clarification would help set the right expectations for developers and
users integrating with ClamD.

Thanks and regards,
Akshit Jain
_______________________________________________

Manage your clamav-users mailing list subscription / unsubscribe:
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav-documentation

https://docs.clamav.net/#mailing-lists-and-chat

Reply via email to