From: "Jason S Short, Ph.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Do you not provide for positive identification for binaries with md5sum >>or sha1sum or gpg signatures?
>It's pretty simple. If these are REQUIREMENTS for you, don't use the >system. >This is a user supported system (FREE). If you MUST have it then I am sure >you can get commercial providers to charge you and provide that service. Jason, all ,uppercased FREE, software as you put it, that is worth its salt, provides for md5 or sha1 checksums, at the least and some provide gpg signature files. I would be glad to instruct you as to how to generate an md5 or sha1 checksum, but this is so trivial that "not" providing one detracts from your honesty. Most responsible "Free" software provide md5sums, sha1sums and a gpg signature. Such a lack of concern, puts the validity of "clamav-win32" in serious question.; Go ahead and visit any properly published code. They offer, md5sums, sha1sums and a signature. Would it be so hard for you to honestly protect the code provided by the developers, or have some devious person inflict users with bad code that may ruin their system. Seems to me that, the little time required to provide a more secure binary would be becoming to a program that "proclaims" to ferret out bad programs. Action and not excuses are called for. Regards, D.Henman --- end of Jasons mail _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-win32
