Michael Minor wrote: > The "for" loop may be more efficient on systems with large memory and > multiple cores, to a point. Clamdscan will send the file to the running > instance of clamd anyway, wont it? Won't clamd handle the threading and > memory use and keep it manageable? > I'm still trying to figure out whether it's more efficient to have a very tiny .Net binary to do it, or a batch file, and to get either one of 'em working right. I'll keep folks updated, because I find it hard to believe I'm the first person ever to want to do exactly what I'm doing.
David Smith MVN.net _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-win32
