Hi Rob, Instead of creating 2 versions, why not both collaborate on one version and therefore reduce the amount of confusion around. I would recommend placing it at Sourceforge and you can both collaborate for future releases.
Just a thought. -------------------------------------------------- From: "tBB" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 3:00 PM To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [clamav-win32] Clam for W32 updates? Forgotten project? > Rob McEwen wrote: > >> I'm confused about all the different versions... and not all of them >> work as well as others. I needed a native win32 version that was >> stable... and the one that Bret links to above is the _only_ one I was >> able to find that satisfied that criteria. All the others (which I could >> find) either were not stable, or were running in unix emulation mode >> (cygwin). (not saying there isn't another stable win32 version... I may >> not have tried them all... but, at the time I tested, this was the only >> one that didn't crash frequently.) > > Actually there are not that many. There is the 'official' version from > http://w32.clamav.net/ which is currently outdated, probably because the > maintainer (Nigel Horne) has other priorities meanwhile as he became > ClamAV's product manager. Then there are the versions at > http://oss.netfarm.it and http://hideout.ath.cx/clamav (mine). Both > should really run equally well as they use the same codebase which is > maintained by Gianluigi Tiesi (the main programmer behind the ClamWin > engine). Personally I would stay away from Cygwin versions too. > > Best regards, > > Nico > > > > > -- > > Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon? > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-win32 > _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-win32
