Hi, On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 22:58 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: > Thanks for your work. I dont want to be pedantic. I just want to get a > make our coding style the same in whole classpath over time. > The javadoc comments are really good.
Yeah, formatting issues are a bit of a pain because we have not always been consistent in the past. We are trying to change that to have all code be consistently formatted. A real automatic indenter will help, but even then some things will have to be fixed by hand. The codeing style used is explained in the Hacker Guide under "Programming Standards": http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/docs/hacking.html#SEC6 If you find anything inconsistent between actual practise and what is described there please say. It could very well be that we have not yet documented current practise completely correct yet. O, and as Michael said. Thanks for the contributions. And sorry for being a pain and pedantic. Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
