Hi Christian,

On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 21:03 +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 21:00 +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 12:28 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > position. Opinions? Volunteers? Anyone want to test against other
> > > runtimes? Or another test set?
> > 
> > Hmm, just tested the patch with cacao.  It finished in 1.48user with and
> > without the patch, so you should benchmark with an interpreter ;-)
> 
> Oops, there was something wrong with my setup.  With patch the time is
> 1.11user.

That seems like an significant improvement. Could you test with a larger
dataset (or just run the test in a loop 10 times)? I still haven't tried
with gcj. If someone could test, that would be super. I believe gcj has
really slow monitor enter and exit support so the speedup should be
significant there. But without testing...

Cheers,

Mark

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Classpath-patches mailing list
Classpath-patches@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches

Reply via email to