Hi Christian, On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 21:03 +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote: > On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 21:00 +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 12:28 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > position. Opinions? Volunteers? Anyone want to test against other > > > runtimes? Or another test set? > > > > Hmm, just tested the patch with cacao. It finished in 1.48user with and > > without the patch, so you should benchmark with an interpreter ;-) > > Oops, there was something wrong with my setup. With patch the time is > 1.11user.
That seems like an significant improvement. Could you test with a larger dataset (or just run the test in a loop 10 times)? I still haven't tried with gcj. If someone could test, that would be super. I believe gcj has really slow monitor enter and exit support so the speedup should be significant there. But without testing... Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list Classpath-patches@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
