On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 10:33:30AM -0500, Anthony Balkissoon wrote: > Uhm, I think that offset and count probably wouldn't have been checked > to be non-negative, otherwise why would they check that offset + count < > 0 ?
That check is for overflow. But i'll make a patch for jeroen's suggestion. TWISTI _______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list Classpath-patches@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
