David Daney wrote: > Gary Benson wrote: > > David Daney wrote: > > > Gary Benson wrote: > > > > ...I'll commit my original patch for now. > > > > > > I hate to sound like I have a burr under the saddle, but does > > > anybody see any merit whatsoever in changing the exception text > > > as I suggested in my previous response to the patch? > > > > What did you suggest? I saw your mail about exception handling, > > but that's all... > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/classpath-patches/2005-12/msg00042.html
Wierd, I never got that mail. But I don't mind the message changing. How do people feel about "file not opened for writing"? Cheers, Gary _______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
