Hi Gary,

(sorry about the incorrect private e-mail)

To do it like this instead:

+    if ((fdmode & FileChannelImpl.WRITE) != 0)
+      out = new DataOutputStream (new FileOutputStream (fd));
+    else
+      out = new DataOutputStream (new OutputStream() {
+              public void write(int b) throws IOException {
+                 throw new IOException("File not open for writing");
+              }
+            });

Regards,
Jeroen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> On Behalf Of Gary Benson
> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 11:24
> To: classpath-patches@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [cp-patches] FYI: 
> OpeningRandomAccessFilesrequiresexcessivepermission
> 
> Hi Jeroen, David,
> 
> What was the point?
> 
> Cheers,
> Gary
> 
> Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> > Hi Gary,
> > 
> > David Daney made a good point that reminded me that it probably
> > wasn't as clever as I thought to extend the FilterOutputStream, so
> > extend OutputStream and implementing all methods would be a better
> > idea. I also liked David's suggestion of making this a reusable
> > utility class in gnu.java.io.*.
> > 
> > (and just to be complete, I agree with the others that the exception
> > text should be changed as well.)
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Jeroen
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > On Behalf Of Gary Benson
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 17:25
> > > To: classpath-patches@gnu.org
> > > Subject: Re: [cp-patches] FYI: Opening 
> > > RandomAccessFilesrequiresexcessivepermission
> > > 
> > > Hi Jeroen,
> > > 
> > > Oh, in that case I'll use your patch, assuming nobody objects.
> > > The mauve test ought to spot anything that slips through.
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Gary
> > > 
> > > Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> > > > Hi Gary,
> > > > 
> > > > I used a FilterOutputStream because that funnels all writes into
> > > > the write(int b) method, so you'd only have to override that
> > > > single method.
> > > > 
> > > > Personally I wouldn't really like a solution based on
> > > > FileChannelImpl, but that's simply because IKVM uses a modified
> > > > version FileChannelImpl.
> > > > 
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Jeroen
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Classpath-patches mailing list
> Classpath-patches@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
> 


_______________________________________________
Classpath-patches mailing list
Classpath-patches@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches

Reply via email to