Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Gary" == Gary Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Gary> At the moment Security.setProperty() will not allow the
> Gary> setting of null property values. Since Security.getProperty()
> Gary> returns null for unset properties this means that the
> Gary> following will fail:
>
> When you sent this last week I replied to it... did you not see
> that?
No, I did not. I certainly wouldn't have committed without replying.
I seem to have missed a bunch of mails lately. I wonder if someone's
installed an overzealous spam filter upstream of me.
> In particular I wanted to know about Mauve tests and documenting the
> behavior of 'null'.
With the patch Security.setProperty("foo", null) will unset the
property. Security.getProperty("foo") returns null for unset
properties.
I'll do a Mauve test now...
> Also your ChangeLog entry is not really formatted properly. I
> wouldn't bother changing that at this point though, it is just a
> pedantic thing.
Ok, sorry.
Cheers,
Gary
_______________________________________________
Classpath-patches mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
