Hi Wolfgang, On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 09:26 +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: > >>Then you also accept any future subclasses. > > > > Except when obj == null. Then it's less robust. > > Yes, it might be null. Also I don't think there will be more > subclasses in the future except the IPP standard will be extended. > > Marc, I can use your way with an additional null check if you > prefer ?
I think it is good to do it just in case one day in the future the will be more subclasses. If that ever happens we will all have forgotten about this little equals() method. Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
