Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Sun, 2006-01-01 at 23:42 +0100, Andreas Tobler wrote:
Well, he hasn't yet, but I'll add my comment here.
I'd like to see it as an unsigned int and not an int. Most systems I
know use unsigned int for socklen_t. Posix.1g also recommends to use
uint32_t for socklen_t.
Well, on this very special OS not even uint32_t is defined. So i'd vote
for `unsigned int' if you think we should use unsigned.
That's fine with me. uint32_t is more or less 'unsigned int'.
Thanks,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
Classpath-patches mailing list
Classpath-patches@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
