Hi Mark, Am 4.1.2006 schrieb "Mark Wielaard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Hi,
>
>On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 16:48 +0100, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> I have put together a new proposal for the VM interface for
>> Plain(Datagram)SocketImpl. I incorporated most of Marks suggestions.
>> Is this ok to check in?
>
>I think this is much cleaner then what we had. Thanks!
>Please do check it in.
Done, using the attached patch and this ChangeLog entry:
2006-01-04 Roman Kennke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* vm/reference/gnu/java/net/VMPlainSocketImpl.java: New VM class.
* vm/reference/gnu/java/net/VMPlainDatagramSocketImpl.java:
New VM class.
* native/jni/java-net/gnu_java_net_VMPlainSocketImpl.c: New file.
* native/jni/java-net/gnu_java_net_VMPlainDatagramSocketImpl.c:
New file.
* native/jni/java-net/gnu_java_net_PlainDatagramSocketImpl.c:
Removed.
* native/jni/java-net/gnu_java_net_PlainSocketImpl.c: Removed.
* native/jni/java-net/Makefile.am: Adjusted for new source files.
* gnu/java/net/PlainDatagramSocketImpl.java: Use new VM interface.
* gnu/java/net/PlainSocketImpl.java: Use new VM interface.
* include/gnu_java_net_PlainDatagramSocketImpl.h: Removed.
* include/gnu_java_net_PlainSocketImpl.h: Removed.
* include/gnu_java_net_VMPlainDatagramSocketImpl.h: New header
file.
* include/gnu_java_net_VMPlainSocketImpl.h: New header file.
BTW: the fix accidentally went in as two commits, sorry if that's
inconvenient.
> But I think we do want to make some small changes
>still to the interface. In particular how we handle the SEND_LOCK,
>timeouts (whether to use SO_TIMEOUT) and how to "cancel" a pending
>accept like Guilhem already said. It is probably easier to change that
>with this large patch out of the way when kaffe merges this in and/or
>when we merge this into libgcj.
Yes, these should also be fixed soon.
/Roman
patch.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
_______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list Classpath-patches@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
