Hi Nicolas, On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 13:58 +0100, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > OK, I thought the generics branch was the equivalent of the 1.5 branch > of sun. But if it's not the case, I have no problem commiting > instrumentation code to HEAD. I do have one question though : the (sun) > API of instrumentation has generics code (for example > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/instrument/ClassDefinition.html), > > does it make sense (and I'm OK if you think it does) to modify the API > in order to fit for a non-generics code?
It is probably easier to just have only the generic version on the branch for now. Otherwise you have to maintain (and merge) two slightly different versions. I assume that users that really want instrumentation will find a way to use the generic branch version (we do now release a snapshot of that). Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list Classpath-patches@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
