On 20 Mar 2006 11:47:34 -0700
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> >>>>> "Stuart" == Stuart Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> Stuart> What's the status on the whole ecj-as-gcc-frontend thing?
> 
> It is still being discussed by the GCC Steering Committee.  I'm
> hopeful that we'll get the go-ahead and be able to have this in GCC
> 4.2.
> 

I had no idea that it was this close actually.  My naive impression was
that the license would still be troublesome, but I guess GCC being under
a GPL+exception (IIRC) solves this... 

> Stuart> Since gcj
> Stuart> and ecj are pretty much the only maintained Free java compilers at
> Stuart> this point, seems to me that's the only blocker to making the generics
> Stuart> branch the primary development trunk and adopting the new language
> Stuart> features wholesale...
> 
> Yes, I want to kill the generics branch (by merging it in :-) this
> year.  With some luck, by the summer.
> 
> Tom

Sounds fantastic; if the ecj/gcj thing is good for 4.2, then the time for this
merge is a lot closer than I thought.
-- 
Andrew :-)

Please avoid sending me Microsoft Office (e.g. Word, PowerPoint) attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Support OpenDocument instead.

Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
public class gcj extends Freedom implements Java { ... }

"Value your freedom, or you will lose it, teaches history. 
`Don't bother us with politics' respond those who don't want to learn." 
-- Richard Stallman

The views expressed above are representative of my own personal
opinions, and not necessarily those of the University of Sheffield.

Attachment: pgp2BENw0Iz0z.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to