On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, David Gilbert wrote: > I'm requesting approval for this patch, just in case I'm missing something > important. > > As I understand the getPathIterator(AffineTransform) method defined in the > Shape interface, if you want the path returned without transformation, you can > pass in null for the AffineTransform. So it is wasteful to create a new > identity transform as we seem to be doing here. >
Seems sane to me. -Sven
