Christian Thalinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The patch looks ok to me.
Great; thanks for reviewing it. > Maybe it should be an uint32_t, as this is the data type from the > union. No, it needs to be the corresponding signed type, so that the subsequent comparison of L against 0 will yield correct results. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
